How We Choose Presidents
Apparently, a good tan is a critical factor. From this story at USA Today online ...
This, I suppose, is why the Republican front-runners are in trouble: With the exception of Romney, they look rather pale and pasty. Giuliani, McCain, Thompson ... take note. A visit or two to the tanning booth might do you good.
Edwards probably did himself the most good.And no, those two lines are not buried in the story; they're the first two lines after the first paragraph.
He looked tanned and confident during the session.
This, I suppose, is why the Republican front-runners are in trouble: With the exception of Romney, they look rather pale and pasty. Giuliani, McCain, Thompson ... take note. A visit or two to the tanning booth might do you good.
4 comments:
Left unsaid was that Edwards was the best-coiffed of the Dem candidates. That's his super-secret double-crossies weapon that will bring the soccer grammas to him in droves.
I agree, who wants a real ugly man or woman leading this country?
That's why dark-skinned candidates traditionally do so well.
Advantage Obama? It's pretty hard to be darker than a black guy. In seriousness though Ive noticed that edwards and romney are often attacked as lightweights, is it possible that the fake-tan and expensive haircut has something to do with that?
Post a Comment